“I’m all for it” – Birmingham City backed to play Wrexham in US after surprise reveal

Birmingham City approached the EFL with a request to host their home League One match against Wrexham in the United States, but the proposal was swiftly rejected by the league.

The request stemmed from Birmingham’s ownership by Knighthead Capital, a US-based entity.

According to the Daily Mail, Birmingham’s owners were interested in moving the fixture across the Atlantic, capitalizing on Wrexham’s popularity in the US. This popularity surged after Hollywood actors Rob McElhenney and Ryan Reynolds purchased Wrexham and released the ‘Welcome to Wrexham’ documentary on Disney+.

Birmingham City underwent a change in ownership last July, led by Tom Wagner and supported by NFL legend Tom Brady as a minority investor, leveraging his previous involvement with Knighthead business ventures.

Bailey Peacock-Farrell could be arriving at St. Andrew’s to add competition to fellow new arrival Ryan Allsop

Had Birmingham been given permission to play a home game in the US, it would have no doubt been a controversial move, with attempts to play a Premier League 39th game in the past being hugely unpopular with English-based supporters.

Birmingham City backed despite EFL turning down Wrexham fixture request

Mike Gibbs, a Birmingham City fan pundit for FLW, acknowledges the potential financial benefits of moving a game against Wrexham to the United States but expresses concerns about the practical implications for the team in a rigorous League One season.

In an interview with Football League World, Mike discussed his perspective: “I don’t have a massive issue with playing games out of the country, it’s something that’s been talked about quite a lot over the last five to ten years with the Premier League 39th game a couple of years ago. I’m all for it because commercially it grows the brand and brings in additional funding, so from that side of it, I’m all for it and have no issue at all.”

However, Mike raised valid concerns about the logistical challenges: “I think the downside for me is that if you’re doing it for a league fixture in the middle of the season, you’ve got to travel there, travel back, and you’ve got jet lag and there’s a very quick turnaround in terms of games in League One, so my biggest issue would the knock-on impact it would have on other fixtures in and around that time, and the whole season.”

He emphasized the potential strain on players: “You could quite easily lose a week or two for one game, and you’ve got to find alternative dates for those fixtures to be played, and the physical and mental impact on those players, you can’t underestimate it. I’ve traveled to the States a fair bit with work, and it has a real knock-on impact for some time.”

Mike’s concerns highlight the balancing act between commercial opportunities and the practicalities of maintaining competitive integrity and player welfare in a demanding league schedule.

The EFL have made the right decision in not allowing Birmingham v Wrexham to be played abroad

The idea of moving a league game between Birmingham City and Wrexham to the US, while potentially lucrative, faces significant opposition from fans and raises concerns about loyalty and practicality.

Birmingham City supporters, who invest in season tickets and passionately support their team, would likely be displeased by such a decision. Moving a league fixture to another continent could be seen as disregarding the commitment and financial support of local fans. This move could strain the relationship between the club’s ownership and its fanbase, potentially leading to backlash against the decision-makers.

While preseason friendlies abroad are common for expanding a club’s global appeal, altering a league fixture is viewed differently. It disrupts the integrity of the domestic competition and poses logistical challenges for players, who would face travel fatigue and adjustment issues.

The EFL’s decision to reject Birmingham City’s proposal reflects these considerations. It upholds the traditional structure of league competitions and prioritizes the interests of local supporters. Maintaining the integrity of league fixtures ensures fairness and stability in football competitions.

In conclusion, while the commercial benefits of such a move are apparent, the strong objections from supporters and practical concerns outweigh these potential gains. The EFL’s stance aligns with preserving the core values and structure of domestic football competitions.

Allowing Birmingham City to move a league fixture to the United States would indeed set a precedent that could potentially alter the fundamental nature of football clubs and their relationship with supporters.

The concern is not just about one isolated game being moved overseas, but the precedent it could establish for future actions. If successful, there might be temptation to repeat such moves for financial gain, which could lead to a sense of detachment and disenfranchisement among local supporters. Football clubs are deeply rooted in their communities, and moving games to foreign countries risks undermining this connection, turning clubs more into franchises than community-based entities.

While Birmingham’s owners may have had ambitious intentions and viewed this as an opportunity to generate significant revenue, it’s crucial to respect the traditions and expectations of football supporters. The essence of a club lies in its home ground, where fans gather to support their team week in and week out.

St. Andrew’s is Birmingham’s home, and the EFL’s decision to block the proposed move to the USA reaffirms the importance of maintaining the integrity and continuity of league fixtures within their intended context. By upholding this principle, the EFL protects the traditional values of football and ensures that clubs remain rooted in their communities.

In conclusion, while commercial opportunities are important, football clubs must prioritize their local fanbase and uphold the integrity of their domestic league commitments. The EFL’s decision to prevent Birmingham City from moving their fixture overseas reflects a commitment to these principles and safeguards the identity of clubs as integral parts of their local communities.